U.S. DISTRICT COURT
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #16-cv-01458-CRC
MCGARVIN v McMONAGLE et al
Assigned to: Judge Christopher R. Cooper
Date Filed: 07/14/2016
16-cv-00420 DWAILEEBE v. MARTINEAU
16-cv-1053 CRUMPACKER v. CIRAOLO-KLEPPER
16-cv-01384 MORRIS v. McMONAGLE
16-cv-01768 PODGORNY v. CIRAOLO-KLEPPER
16-cv-2089 DeORIO v. CIRAOLO-KLEPPER
Bill McGarvin resides in Missouri and, in April of 2016, he contacted me through this website asking if I would review his Individual Master File (IMF) records for 1991, 1992 and 1993 to determine if I saw the same pattern of IRS computer fraud I had observed in other cases.
After reviewing his evidence, I immediately recognized the same pattern of three-digit transaction codes that nameless IRS employees enter into the IMF computer system, then conceal, by overriding the system’s strict security features.
Digging deeper, I discovered that, on September 19, 1995, IRS prepared, but did not sign, Form 4549A showing increases in taxes of $23,379.00 for years 1991, 1992, and 1993. I also noted this statement: “The Internal Revenue Service has agreements with State tax agencies under which information about Federal tax, including increases or decreases, is exchanged with the States.”
It is through this information sharing mechanism that the “fruit of the poisonous tree” spreads far beyond the Federal realm.
Later, on March 8, 1999, IRS issued Notice Number CP 504 “Urgent!! We intend to levy on certain assets. Please respond NOW.” The balance due of $51,796.10 for 1991, 1992, and 1993 was purportedly derived from Form 1040As that IRS prepared on Bill’s behalf for each year. As in every other case, though, the IRS never prepares a Substitute For Return (SFR) on any date.
After discussing my findings with Bill, he decided to file a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to enjoin (stop) the IRS from falsifying federal records. This was to be one of many lawsuits subsequently filed by Plaintiffs from all over America who discovered that their IMF records had been similarly falsified.
Following is the Docket Sheet containing links to all the documents filed in this case.
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia