In my last blog, dated September 5, 2022, a panel made up of D.C. Appellate Court Judges Pillard, Rao and Walker issued a confusing Order that did not contain the usual definitive language, i.e. “affirming the lower Court’s ruling”.

Instead, they wrote “The court concludes, on its own motion, that oral argument will not assist the court in this case. Accordingly, the court will dispose of the appeal without oral argument on the basis of the record and the presentations in the briefs.”

Since then, I’ve been frequently checking PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) for any new docket entries by the Court.

On September 20, 2022, the criminals in black robes issued the Order I knew was coming:

“ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed March 18, 2021, and May 6, 2021, be affirmed.”

A full copy of the two-page Judgment follows:

Note the following statement made by the panel:

“Appellant relies on a brief filed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and an order of the United States Tax Court in another case, both of which are attached to the amended complaint in this case. These documents, however, indicate only that no deficiency notice for the relevant tax years was issued to appellant during the ninety-day period preceding his filing of the petition in that case. They do not support a plausible inference that a deficiency notice for the relevant tax period never was sent to appellant.

In any event, appellant has not plausibly alleged that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) failed to mail him notices of deficiency for the relevant tax years.”

Here is an excerpt from the first page of the IRS’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction:

Notice that it makes no mention of a “ninety-day period” but, contrary to the ruling of the panel, it supports my contention that no Notice of Deficiency or Notice of Determination was EVER sent to me by the IRS for the years 2000 through 2018. This is important because, absent either of those two documents, there can be no assessment and, absent an assessment, there can be no income tax liability.

Given this blatant corruption by the court in the face of incontrovertible evidence, along with the extremely low probability that the Supreme Court would ever review my petition, I have decided not to pursue this case further.

This doesn’t mean, however, that I’m going to quietly ride away into the sunset, never to be heard from again. It is evident that “We the People” will never be truly free until the scourge of both the corporate and individual income tax is erased from our lives.

I am currently researching and writing the plan for a peaceful, constitutional, 21st Century American Revolution to do just that.

Tentative release date: January 2023.

Stay tuned.

In liberty,

RAM