The wheels of injustice turn slowly when dealing with Executive and Judicial branch fraud, but, they do eventually turn.
In that regard, please find the following recently received documents:
In case 16-2313 Ellis, et al v. Jackson, et al
Doc 37 USDC Order denying Doc. 27, Plaintiffs’ Rule 59 Motion to Alter or Amend Judge Kelly’s Order of Dismissal
Doc 38 USDC Memorandum Opinion in support of Order
20200113 16-2313 Docket Sheet
In case 17-00022 Stanley, et al v. Lynch, et al
20200113 USDC Minute Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Rule 59 Motion to Alter or Amend Judge Kelly’s Order of Dismissal
20200113 17-00022 - Docket Sheet
We filed the Rule 59 Motion on July 16, 2018 (18 months ago) after Judge Kelly, on June 19, 2018, adopted Magistrate Harvey's Report and Recommendation GRANTING the DoJ's Motion to Dismiss both cases.
Now, we must appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
This is a request for funds to defray the costs of these appeals, each of which must be filed separately.
We estimate that each appeal will cost around $750.00 ($505.00 filing fee + printing and postage) for a total of $1,500.00.
If you are in a position to donate funds to this effort, please do so by following the instructions here.
Any amount will be welcomed and appreciated.
To help you all understand the battle we've been fighting, here is a bit of background information to refresh your memories.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Case 16-cv-02313 Ellis, et al v. Jackson, et al was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on November 18, 2016.
Plaintiffs are: Michael B. Ellis, Robert A. McNeil and Harold Stanley. In addition, Movants are: Barry E. Brooks, Lee Prymmer, William McGarvin, Ebenezer Howe IV, Lynne Kuchenbuch, Jan Marie Schieberl, Anthony Tinsman, Todd B. Casey, Gary Dwaileebe, Gregory Darst.
Defendants are: Judge Amy Berman Jackson, Judge Christopher Cooper, Appeals Court Judge Padmanabhan Srinivasan, DoJ Caroline Ciraolo-Klepper, DoJ Attorney Ryan McMonagle, Commissioner of the IRS, U.S. Attorney General, Two Unnamed IRS/DoJ attorneys, John Koskinen- IRS Commissioner (in personal capacity), Loretta Lynch - U.S. Attorney General (in personal capacity), and Barack Hussein Obama II (in personal capacity).
We filed this case complaining that the judges were involved in supporting the executive branch (IRS) record falsification program by which the income tax is enforced on non-filers.
DoJ assigned Megan Eileen Hoffman-Logsdon to represent the Defendants.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Case 17-cv-1700022 Stanley, et al v. Lynch, et al was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on January 4, 2017.
Plaintiffs are Harold Stanley, Michael B. Ellis and Robert A. McNeil.
Defendants are: Loretta Lynch - U.S. Attorney General (in personal capacity), Barack Hussein Obama II (in personal capacity) and John Koskinen- IRS Commissioner (in personal capacity).
DoJ also assigned attorney Megan Eileen Hoffman-Logsdon to represent the Defendants.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Both cases were originally assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, who referred the cases to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey for full case management up to, but excluding, trial.
On March 8, 2017, DoJ filed a Motion to Consolidate Cases 16-cv-2313 and 17-cv-1700022.
On April 12, 2017, Magistrate Harvey Granted DoJ's Motion to Consolidate the two cases.
On April 26, 2017, DoJ filed its Amended Motion to Dismiss which applies to both cases.
On August 11, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Recuse both Judge Sullivan and Magistrate Harvey.
On October 31, 2017, Judge Sullivan quit both cases instead of recusing. The cases were reassigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly, with Magistrate Harvey remaining for full case management.
On November 1, 2017, Magistrate Harvey issued his Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that the Court GRANT the DoJ's Motion to Dismiss both cases.
On June 19, 2018, Judge Kelly adopted Magistrate Harvey's Report and Recommendation GRANTING the DoJ's Motion to Dismiss both cases.
On July 16, 2018, we filed our Rule 59 Motion to Alter or Amend Judge Kelly's Order of Dismissal, citing 10 ”errors” he committed in support of the IRS program.
On August 2, 2018, DoJ attorney Michael Martineau filed a Notice of Appearance in the cases on behalf of the U.S. Attorney General.
January 13, 2020, after 18 months, Judge Kelly issued an Order DENYING our July 19, 2018 Rule 59 Motion to Alter or Amend his June 19, 2018 Order of Dismissal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As is painfully obvious, both the Executive and Judicial branches are heavily invested in stopping our efforts to enjoin the IRS from committing fraud by falsifying its computer and paper records, and to enjoin the DoJ from using these falsified records in the enforcement of the income tax, thereby destroying the lives of innocent Americans in the process.
I pray you will search your hearts and continue to support Michael and me as we seek to restore the Rule of Law in America.
Blessings to you all.